<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Public Cloud Adoption &#8211; Where Are You?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rocketpanther.com/ciostage/cloud-computing/public-cloud-computing-adoption/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rocketpanther.com/ciostage/cloud-computing/public-cloud-computing-adoption</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2014 02:53:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Eckert</title>
		<link>http://rocketpanther.com/ciostage/cloud-computing/public-cloud-computing-adoption#comment-462</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Eckert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 22:22:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciodashboard.com/?p=1342#comment-462</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was at the DX today listening to the Cloud discussion and wanted to raise the following 3 Questions:

IMHO - The value of the cloud is about the apps - not the hardware - as the hardware is just a commodity item and already comes &quot;pre-integrated - all you need to do is snap it together and add power. Then scale it ad infinitum.â€

Now take me into the near future: I have 100&#039;s of miles of hardware performance headroom in the cloud - but if my value is in my apps - Question #1: How long before we see SaaS really make inroads in the CREATION of functional objects that can be bolted together and become self-aware (self-aware of other objects around them - and most importantly - not impact the objects supporting some else&#039;s application - even if they are shared objects) to assemble this functional objects into an application?

If all functional objects are self-aware - won&#039;t innovation diminish? It has been stated that Television has &quot;frozen the English language&quot;. Meaning that eventually everyone will have a common point of reference to how the english language is spoken. The English language has stopped evolving. (ask yourself WHY we no longer talk like Shakespearean actors). If you agree with this concept - hereâ€™s Question #2 - Are we shooting ourselves in the foot by locking into a single language to create even the most granular of functional objects?

And as a follow up - Question #3 - when this eventually comes true how will we &quot;manage&quot; these objects? I feel somewhere in here there is an industry and a role within an organization that hasnâ€™t been created yet.

Thanks again! This is good stuff.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was at the DX today listening to the Cloud discussion and wanted to raise the following 3 Questions:</p>
<p>IMHO &#8211; The value of the cloud is about the apps &#8211; not the hardware &#8211; as the hardware is just a commodity item and already comes &#8220;pre-integrated &#8211; all you need to do is snap it together and add power. Then scale it ad infinitum.â€</p>
<p>Now take me into the near future: I have 100&#8217;s of miles of hardware performance headroom in the cloud &#8211; but if my value is in my apps &#8211; Question #1: How long before we see SaaS really make inroads in the CREATION of functional objects that can be bolted together and become self-aware (self-aware of other objects around them &#8211; and most importantly &#8211; not impact the objects supporting some else&#8217;s application &#8211; even if they are shared objects) to assemble this functional objects into an application?</p>
<p>If all functional objects are self-aware &#8211; won&#8217;t innovation diminish? It has been stated that Television has &#8220;frozen the English language&#8221;. Meaning that eventually everyone will have a common point of reference to how the english language is spoken. The English language has stopped evolving. (ask yourself WHY we no longer talk like Shakespearean actors). If you agree with this concept &#8211; hereâ€™s Question #2 &#8211; Are we shooting ourselves in the foot by locking into a single language to create even the most granular of functional objects?</p>
<p>And as a follow up &#8211; Question #3 &#8211; when this eventually comes true how will we &#8220;manage&#8221; these objects? I feel somewhere in here there is an industry and a role within an organization that hasnâ€™t been created yet.</p>
<p>Thanks again! This is good stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Eckert</title>
		<link>http://rocketpanther.com/ciostage/cloud-computing/public-cloud-computing-adoption#comment-465</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Eckert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 22:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciodashboard.com/?p=1342#comment-465</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was at the DX today listening to the Cloud discussion and wanted to raise the following 3 Questions:

IMHO - The value of the cloud is about the apps - not the hardware - as the hardware is just a commodity item and already comes &quot;pre-integrated - all you need to do is snap it together and add power. Then scale it ad infinitum.â€

Now take me into the near future: I have 100&#039;s of miles of hardware performance headroom in the cloud - but if my value is in my apps - Question #1: How long before we see SaaS really make inroads in the CREATION of functional objects that can be bolted together and become self-aware (self-aware of other objects around them - and most importantly - not impact the objects supporting some else&#039;s application - even if they are shared objects) to assemble this functional objects into an application?

If all functional objects are self-aware - won&#039;t innovation diminish? It has been stated that Television has &quot;frozen the English language&quot;. Meaning that eventually everyone will have a common point of reference to how the english language is spoken. The English language has stopped evolving. (ask yourself WHY we no longer talk like Shakespearean actors). If you agree with this concept - hereâ€™s Question #2 - Are we shooting ourselves in the foot by locking into a single language to create even the most granular of functional objects?

And as a follow up - Question #3 - when this eventually comes true how will we &quot;manage&quot; these objects? I feel somewhere in here there is an industry and a role within an organization that hasnâ€™t been created yet.

Thanks again! This is good stuff.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was at the DX today listening to the Cloud discussion and wanted to raise the following 3 Questions:</p>
<p>IMHO &#8211; The value of the cloud is about the apps &#8211; not the hardware &#8211; as the hardware is just a commodity item and already comes &#8220;pre-integrated &#8211; all you need to do is snap it together and add power. Then scale it ad infinitum.â€</p>
<p>Now take me into the near future: I have 100&#8217;s of miles of hardware performance headroom in the cloud &#8211; but if my value is in my apps &#8211; Question #1: How long before we see SaaS really make inroads in the CREATION of functional objects that can be bolted together and become self-aware (self-aware of other objects around them &#8211; and most importantly &#8211; not impact the objects supporting some else&#8217;s application &#8211; even if they are shared objects) to assemble this functional objects into an application?</p>
<p>If all functional objects are self-aware &#8211; won&#8217;t innovation diminish? It has been stated that Television has &#8220;frozen the English language&#8221;. Meaning that eventually everyone will have a common point of reference to how the english language is spoken. The English language has stopped evolving. (ask yourself WHY we no longer talk like Shakespearean actors). If you agree with this concept &#8211; hereâ€™s Question #2 &#8211; Are we shooting ourselves in the foot by locking into a single language to create even the most granular of functional objects?</p>
<p>And as a follow up &#8211; Question #3 &#8211; when this eventually comes true how will we &#8220;manage&#8221; these objects? I feel somewhere in here there is an industry and a role within an organization that hasnâ€™t been created yet.</p>
<p>Thanks again! This is good stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Ridgwell</title>
		<link>http://rocketpanther.com/ciostage/cloud-computing/public-cloud-computing-adoption#comment-461</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Ridgwell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 10:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciodashboard.com/?p=1342#comment-461</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We fall into category number 4. (Developed a custom app on a cloud platform). We&#039;re getting good user traction (particularly in the last 6 months) and mainly from very large organizations. Security is often questioned (by banks mainly) although once we show them our security measures, people often say that if anything, it&#039;s safer than their inhouse set up.

Best regards,
Mark]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We fall into category number 4. (Developed a custom app on a cloud platform). We&#8217;re getting good user traction (particularly in the last 6 months) and mainly from very large organizations. Security is often questioned (by banks mainly) although once we show them our security measures, people often say that if anything, it&#8217;s safer than their inhouse set up.</p>
<p>Best regards,<br />
Mark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Ridgwell</title>
		<link>http://rocketpanther.com/ciostage/cloud-computing/public-cloud-computing-adoption#comment-464</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Ridgwell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 10:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciodashboard.com/?p=1342#comment-464</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We fall into category number 4. (Developed a custom app on a cloud platform). We&#039;re getting good user traction (particularly in the last 6 months) and mainly from very large organizations. Security is often questioned (by banks mainly) although once we show them our security measures, people often say that if anything, it&#039;s safer than their inhouse set up.

Best regards,
Mark]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We fall into category number 4. (Developed a custom app on a cloud platform). We&#8217;re getting good user traction (particularly in the last 6 months) and mainly from very large organizations. Security is often questioned (by banks mainly) although once we show them our security measures, people often say that if anything, it&#8217;s safer than their inhouse set up.</p>
<p>Best regards,<br />
Mark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jfbauer</title>
		<link>http://rocketpanther.com/ciostage/cloud-computing/public-cloud-computing-adoption#comment-460</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jfbauer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 12:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciodashboard.com/?p=1342#comment-460</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Representing the legal services industry, with so much custom software developed to support document coding and data management and reporting with a strong focus on security, the ability to transition to the cloud does not immediately fall inline with the current IT multi year plan.  Thus, extrapolating to the wider legal services industry, I would venture to say we collectively fit in the first category.

Related blog: http://bit.ly/ZsozZ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Representing the legal services industry, with so much custom software developed to support document coding and data management and reporting with a strong focus on security, the ability to transition to the cloud does not immediately fall inline with the current IT multi year plan.  Thus, extrapolating to the wider legal services industry, I would venture to say we collectively fit in the first category.</p>
<p>Related blog: <a href="http://bit.ly/ZsozZ" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/ZsozZ</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jfbauer</title>
		<link>http://rocketpanther.com/ciostage/cloud-computing/public-cloud-computing-adoption#comment-463</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jfbauer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 12:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciodashboard.com/?p=1342#comment-463</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Representing the legal services industry, with so much custom software developed to support document coding and data management and reporting with a strong focus on security, the ability to transition to the cloud does not immediately fall inline with the current IT multi year plan.  Thus, extrapolating to the wider legal services industry, I would venture to say we collectively fit in the first category.

Related blog: http://bit.ly/ZsozZ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Representing the legal services industry, with so much custom software developed to support document coding and data management and reporting with a strong focus on security, the ability to transition to the cloud does not immediately fall inline with the current IT multi year plan.  Thus, extrapolating to the wider legal services industry, I would venture to say we collectively fit in the first category.</p>
<p>Related blog: <a href="http://bit.ly/ZsozZ" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/ZsozZ</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Public Cloud Adoption â€“ Where Are You? â€” CIO Dashboard -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://rocketpanther.com/ciostage/cloud-computing/public-cloud-computing-adoption#comment-459</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tweets that mention Public Cloud Adoption â€“ Where Are You? â€” CIO Dashboard -- Topsy.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 17:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciodashboard.com/?p=1342#comment-459</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by lmclaughlin and simplethinker. simplethinker said: You are right that everyone considering #cloud. Companies have to decide where they want to go. RT @cbcurran http://j.mp/4qMRHV [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] This post was mentioned on Twitter by lmclaughlin and simplethinker. simplethinker said: You are right that everyone considering #cloud. Companies have to decide where they want to go. RT @cbcurran <a href="http://j.mp/4qMRHV" rel="nofollow">http://j.mp/4qMRHV</a> [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
