<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Problem With IT Benchmarks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rocketpanther.com/ciostage/metrics-and-measurement/the-problem-with-it-benchmarks/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rocketpanther.com/ciostage/metrics-and-measurement/the-problem-with-it-benchmarks</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2014 02:53:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louie Ehrlich, Chevron CIO &#8211; Future State CIO Journey â€” CIO Dashboard</title>
		<link>http://rocketpanther.com/ciostage/metrics-and-measurement/the-problem-with-it-benchmarks#comment-275</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Louie Ehrlich, Chevron CIO &#8211; Future State CIO Journey â€” CIO Dashboard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 15:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciodashboard.com/?p=818#comment-275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] stage of the CIO role, one thing Iâ€™ve done to identify the gaps and also build credibility is to benchmark. Itâ€™s difficult to have credibility around things like efficiency and cost if you have nothing to [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] stage of the CIO role, one thing Iâ€™ve done to identify the gaps and also build credibility is to benchmark. Itâ€™s difficult to have credibility around things like efficiency and cost if you have nothing to [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The CIO Guide to Dashboards â€” CIO Dashboard</title>
		<link>http://rocketpanther.com/ciostage/metrics-and-measurement/the-problem-with-it-benchmarks#comment-274</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The CIO Guide to Dashboards â€” CIO Dashboard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 14:26:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciodashboard.com/?p=818#comment-274</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] The Problem with IT Benchmarks [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] The Problem with IT Benchmarks [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernard Londeix</title>
		<link>http://rocketpanther.com/ciostage/metrics-and-measurement/the-problem-with-it-benchmarks#comment-271</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bernard Londeix]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 23:35:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciodashboard.com/?p=818#comment-271</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wouldn&#039;t it be the moment to recommend GQM?
All the best,
Bernard]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldn&#8217;t it be the moment to recommend GQM?<br />
All the best,<br />
Bernard</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernard Londeix</title>
		<link>http://rocketpanther.com/ciostage/metrics-and-measurement/the-problem-with-it-benchmarks#comment-273</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bernard Londeix]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 23:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciodashboard.com/?p=818#comment-273</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wouldn&#039;t it be the moment to recommend GQM?
All the best,
Bernard]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldn&#8217;t it be the moment to recommend GQM?<br />
All the best,<br />
Bernard</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grant (PG) Rule</title>
		<link>http://rocketpanther.com/ciostage/metrics-and-measurement/the-problem-with-it-benchmarks#comment-270</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Grant (PG) Rule]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 19:39:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciodashboard.com/?p=818#comment-270</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a benchmarker, I have to agree with Chris. The most useful benchmarks and comparisons are those you make with yourself.

It doesn&#039;t really matter what the chap next door, or two streets over, is doing. What matters is that you are being more effective today at achieving your strategic goals than you were yesterday.

Of course, external benchmarks can be useful as marketing material. They may help you convince others that they are standing on a burning platform, and create that sense of urgency that is imperative if any kind of transformation is to take place. But internal comparisons of what you could do if you removed the waste from the process, with what you are currently achieving, will always be more convincing than comparison to 3rd parties.

You need a quantitative view of where you are, a vision of where you want to be, an understanding of the gaps, a route map of how to get there from here, and the will to act. That&#039;s all. It&#039;s easy really. Just make it so.

&quot;The ways of the military are five: measurement, assessment, calculation, comparison and victory&quot;â€¦ to paraphrase Sun Tzu.

Regards,
 Grant (PG) Rule
 MD, Software Measurement Services Ltd ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a benchmarker, I have to agree with Chris. The most useful benchmarks and comparisons are those you make with yourself.</p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t really matter what the chap next door, or two streets over, is doing. What matters is that you are being more effective today at achieving your strategic goals than you were yesterday.</p>
<p>Of course, external benchmarks can be useful as marketing material. They may help you convince others that they are standing on a burning platform, and create that sense of urgency that is imperative if any kind of transformation is to take place. But internal comparisons of what you could do if you removed the waste from the process, with what you are currently achieving, will always be more convincing than comparison to 3rd parties.</p>
<p>You need a quantitative view of where you are, a vision of where you want to be, an understanding of the gaps, a route map of how to get there from here, and the will to act. That&#8217;s all. It&#8217;s easy really. Just make it so.</p>
<p>&#8220;The ways of the military are five: measurement, assessment, calculation, comparison and victory&#8221;â€¦ to paraphrase Sun Tzu.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
 Grant (PG) Rule<br />
 MD, Software Measurement Services Ltd </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grant (PG) Rule</title>
		<link>http://rocketpanther.com/ciostage/metrics-and-measurement/the-problem-with-it-benchmarks#comment-272</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Grant (PG) Rule]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 19:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciodashboard.com/?p=818#comment-272</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a benchmarker, I have to agree with Chris. The most useful benchmarks and comparisons are those you make with yourself.

It doesn&#039;t really matter what the chap next door, or two streets over, is doing. What matters is that you are being more effective today at achieving your strategic goals than you were yesterday.

Of course, external benchmarks can be useful as marketing material. They may help you convince others that they are standing on a burning platform, and create that sense of urgency that is imperative if any kind of transformation is to take place. But internal comparisons of what you could do if you removed the waste from the process, with what you are currently achieving, will always be more convincing than comparison to 3rd parties.

You need a quantitative view of where you are, a vision of where you want to be, an understanding of the gaps, a route map of how to get there from here, and the will to act. That&#039;s all. It&#039;s easy really. Just make it so.

&quot;The ways of the military are five: measurement, assessment, calculation, comparison and victory&quot;â€¦ to paraphrase Sun Tzu.

Regards,
 Grant (PG) Rule
 MD, Software Measurement Services Ltd]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a benchmarker, I have to agree with Chris. The most useful benchmarks and comparisons are those you make with yourself.</p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t really matter what the chap next door, or two streets over, is doing. What matters is that you are being more effective today at achieving your strategic goals than you were yesterday.</p>
<p>Of course, external benchmarks can be useful as marketing material. They may help you convince others that they are standing on a burning platform, and create that sense of urgency that is imperative if any kind of transformation is to take place. But internal comparisons of what you could do if you removed the waste from the process, with what you are currently achieving, will always be more convincing than comparison to 3rd parties.</p>
<p>You need a quantitative view of where you are, a vision of where you want to be, an understanding of the gaps, a route map of how to get there from here, and the will to act. That&#8217;s all. It&#8217;s easy really. Just make it so.</p>
<p>&#8220;The ways of the military are five: measurement, assessment, calculation, comparison and victory&#8221;â€¦ to paraphrase Sun Tzu.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
 Grant (PG) Rule<br />
 MD, Software Measurement Services Ltd</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
